Has the BCC just whacked in this illogical idea for the Anzac Park car park into the ‘Application for Project Change’, just to try to satisfy, on paper, The Coordinator-General’s conditions with regards to workforce car parking? It seems like this to the locals.Where is the required EIS done for this new plan for Anzac Park?
How do you just spray down bitumen on a slope like this for a 300 bay car park?
How is it that no ‘significant trees’ in this photograph will not be lost? Peter Matic said that no trees would be removed. (Photo taken today)
BCC Application for Project Change, states:
Temporary construction workforce parking areas would be established in Anzac Park for up to 300 vehicles, without any loss of significant trees in the park, and with access from Dean Street only.
The proposed temporary construction workforce car park in Anzac Park comprises open grassland with scattered trees. Existing trees within the proposed car park would be retained and protected during its construction and use.
Is it ‘significant trees’ or ‘existing trees' or as Peter Matic said "No trees"?
I thought the trees were scattered so children can run around on the open grass? There are barbecues and play equipment on the edge of these 'scattered trees', it is (was) a great place to spend time with the family.
ReplyDelete